Interesting post on how Hyflux ordinary Shareholder is losing money even when the company reported a Net Profit
Monday, August 28, 2017
Sunday, August 20, 2017
The perils of calling the peak of the equities bull run
Current market is a time where PE ratio is close to the Great Depression in 1929...
http://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe/
Saturday, August 19, 2017
ASSESSING LISTED COMPANIES - THE LESS LOANS THE BETTER?
Yong Chia Win May 2, 2017
When you buy a company’s shares, do you wish that the company has made as little loans as possible?
If your answer to the above question is “yes”, you might be a conservative investor. But in actual fact, when it comes to loans, we cannot always assume that “less is more”.
Two ways that companies raise capital
Companies need funds to operate and develop their businesses, and they typically raise funds through two ways: 1) Loans (from banks or by issuing bonds), and 2) Issuing shares.
Theoretically speaking, a company may have a better credit if it takes a smaller loan. Less interest is incurred too, and that can translate to more money issued to shareholders through dividends. On top of that, keeping the debt level low also reduces the risk of the company facing financial problems.
Analysing a company’s debt situation
We will not be able to gauge if a company has a high or low debt level just by looking at its amount of loans. In order to get a better idea of a company’s financial situation, we can look at the following two ratios:
1. Debt/equity ratio
The formula for calculating debt/equity ratio is simply total liabilities/shareholders’ equity, where total liabilities = non-current liabilities + current liabilities.
This ratio indicates how much debt a company is using to finance its assets relative to the amount of value represented in shareholders’ equity.
In his book, Fu Zu Zi You Ren 2 (which translates to He who is Financially Free), investment expert Dr Chan Yan Chong also pointed out that this ratio can tell us for every dollar of shares owned by the shareholder, how much of it actually belongs to the creditor.
A higher debt/equity ratio would mean that the company has a higher amount of loans relative to capital provided by shareholders. It is not so much of a problem if the company has sustainable profit to pay off interest. But if earnings and profits were unable to meet the borrowing cost, the company would likely land in a problematic financial situation.
For instance, if we look at Hong Kong-listed China Evergrande Group, which the Wall Street Journal referred to as the “world’s most indebted developer”, has a debt to equity ratio of 3.40 as of Dec 2016, according to gurufocus.com. If not including the revaluation gains on its invested properties, the company would not have made profits last year.
Even though the share price of China Evergrande Group rose sharply last month, there was no solid basis for its gains.
2. Debt Ratio
Debt ratio also referred to as debt-to-assets ratio, is calculated by dividing total debt by total assets. Generally speaking, if a company has a debt ratio of more than 50 percent, it has a high level of debt.
However, whether a debt ratio is considered high or low may vary widely across industries. According to Investopedia, a debt ratio of 30 percent may be too high for an industry with volatile cash flows, whereas a debt level of 40 percent may be easily manageable for a company in the utility sector, where cash flows are stable and higher debt ratios are the norm.
The debt ratio is also something that investors in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are concerned about, as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) imposed a 45 percent leverage limit on REITs.
Companies with fewer loans are not necessarily better for investors.
Why is that so?
Assuming that a company chooses to raise funds through issuing shares, each investor’s stake might be diluted. If the company’s business flourishes and its earnings growth are higher than interest rates, then debt financing is a more reasonable choice, which is also more beneficial to shareholders.
Also, in an environment where the inflation rate is high but interest rates are low, the actual cost of borrowing is lowered, and in this case, companies should consider borrowing money too.
When you buy a company’s shares, do you wish that the company has made as little loans as possible?
If your answer to the above question is “yes”, you might be a conservative investor. But in actual fact, when it comes to loans, we cannot always assume that “less is more”.
Two ways that companies raise capital
Companies need funds to operate and develop their businesses, and they typically raise funds through two ways: 1) Loans (from banks or by issuing bonds), and 2) Issuing shares.
Theoretically speaking, a company may have a better credit if it takes a smaller loan. Less interest is incurred too, and that can translate to more money issued to shareholders through dividends. On top of that, keeping the debt level low also reduces the risk of the company facing financial problems.
Analysing a company’s debt situation
We will not be able to gauge if a company has a high or low debt level just by looking at its amount of loans. In order to get a better idea of a company’s financial situation, we can look at the following two ratios:
1. Debt/equity ratio
The formula for calculating debt/equity ratio is simply total liabilities/shareholders’ equity, where total liabilities = non-current liabilities + current liabilities.
This ratio indicates how much debt a company is using to finance its assets relative to the amount of value represented in shareholders’ equity.
In his book, Fu Zu Zi You Ren 2 (which translates to He who is Financially Free), investment expert Dr Chan Yan Chong also pointed out that this ratio can tell us for every dollar of shares owned by the shareholder, how much of it actually belongs to the creditor.
A higher debt/equity ratio would mean that the company has a higher amount of loans relative to capital provided by shareholders. It is not so much of a problem if the company has sustainable profit to pay off interest. But if earnings and profits were unable to meet the borrowing cost, the company would likely land in a problematic financial situation.
For instance, if we look at Hong Kong-listed China Evergrande Group, which the Wall Street Journal referred to as the “world’s most indebted developer”, has a debt to equity ratio of 3.40 as of Dec 2016, according to gurufocus.com. If not including the revaluation gains on its invested properties, the company would not have made profits last year.
Even though the share price of China Evergrande Group rose sharply last month, there was no solid basis for its gains.
2. Debt Ratio
Debt ratio also referred to as debt-to-assets ratio, is calculated by dividing total debt by total assets. Generally speaking, if a company has a debt ratio of more than 50 percent, it has a high level of debt.
However, whether a debt ratio is considered high or low may vary widely across industries. According to Investopedia, a debt ratio of 30 percent may be too high for an industry with volatile cash flows, whereas a debt level of 40 percent may be easily manageable for a company in the utility sector, where cash flows are stable and higher debt ratios are the norm.
The debt ratio is also something that investors in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are concerned about, as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) imposed a 45 percent leverage limit on REITs.
Companies with fewer loans are not necessarily better for investors.
Why is that so?
Assuming that a company chooses to raise funds through issuing shares, each investor’s stake might be diluted. If the company’s business flourishes and its earnings growth are higher than interest rates, then debt financing is a more reasonable choice, which is also more beneficial to shareholders.
Also, in an environment where the inflation rate is high but interest rates are low, the actual cost of borrowing is lowered, and in this case, companies should consider borrowing money too.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Saturday, July 22, 2017
China is focusing on the wrong things to fix its economy, says economist
- China's capital controls have helped avoid a crisis, but it needs to fix fundamental problems
- Property prices, meanwhile, have "a long way to fall"
China should focus on fixing fundamental problems that may trigger a financial crisis instead of witch-hunting, an economist said Friday.
Speaking to CNBC's "Squawk Box," independent economist Andy Xie said China has managed to avoid a financial crisis now by tightening capital controls, but there's more to be done.
"Any other country would've collapsed, but China had started with that big cushion (of foreign reserves). Still the government had to crack down on capital flight. Without bottling up the country, China would be in a crisis now," Xie said.
Chinese companies and individuals have been snapping up overseas assets, prompting authorities to tighten controls on outflows such as limiting offshore investments.
Recently, several of China's largest overseas asset buyers were scrutinized on instructions from the banking regulator.
"Unfortunately, China is focusing on who's going to trigger the crisis; they are not talking about the fundamental conditions for the crisis, rather they focus on the technical aspect, on who's going to trigger the crisis," said Xie.
The recent actions from Chinese authorities, he said, are more about: "The people who took the money out last year, let's check them out, maybe send some to jail."
Experts have expressed concerns over high debt levels and the frothy property market in China, which was an issue that Xie also took issue with.
"Half of the loans in China are exposed to the property sector, that's even higher than Japan in 1989," said Xie. Japan's asset price bubble in the 1980s popped in the early 1990s.
In tier-1 cities like Beijing and Shanghai, for instance, the price for 1 square meter (10.8 square feet) could cost a buyer a year of his income.
In a "normal" city like New York and Tokyo, it would cost buyers a month of income for the same area, he added.
"So if you want 100 square meters to start a family, that means 100 years of income," Xie said.
Chinese property prices have "a long way to fall," he said, likening it to Japan 25 years ago.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Sunday, June 11, 2017
What is Last Twelve Months (LTM) or Trailing Twelve Months (TTM)?
How do we adjust for Last Twelve Month (LTM) or Trailing Twelve Month (TTM)? Is the adjustment the same for Balance Sheet?
Check out the graphic below to understand more:


Monday, May 1, 2017
BERKSHIRE 101: An introduction to Warren Buffett's $400 billion empire
Very well written summary of how Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger grow this 'GIANT' (by Yahoo Finance)
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) (BRK-B) was a struggling textile company when
Warren Buffett first invested in it in 1962.
Today, it’s a $400
billion behemoth. In Buffett’s own words, it’s a “sprawling conglomerate,
constantly trying to sprawl further.”
The companies in
Berkshire’s portfolio vary greatly. But one thing ties them all together:
Buffett says they’re about “maximizing long-term capital growth.”
Here’s a brief
introduction to Berkshire Hathaway.
The insurance business is the backbone of the
company
After it acquired
National Indemnity in 1967, Berkshire relied on its insurance businesses to
power much of its expansion.
As Berkshire has
gotten bigger and diversified its businesses, its insurance operations have
become a smaller contributor to earnings than in the past, currently making up
26% of total company earnings. But they remain an important part of the
company’s access to a permanent capital base by generating what’s known as
“float.”
“Float” is money
collected up front that is not paid out until later. In Berkshire’s property
& casualty (P&C) insurance businesses, premiums are collected up front,
but claims are paid out often years or decades later, allowing the float to be
used for investments.
Today, Berkshire’s
insurance group consists of four segments: GEICO (auto insurance), General Re
(reinsurance), BH Reinsurance Group (retroactive reinsurance through subsidiaries),
and BH Primary (focused on commercial markets, led by National Indemnity Co).
The property and
casualty insurance business has faced headwinds—including deteriorating
pricing and margin compression. But 2016 posted solid performance, with GEICO
in particular making a comeback. Last year, GEICO suffered from higher
personal auto claims (as a result of more low gas prices and more driving), and
this year it accelerated new business efforts.
Berkshire’s insurance
float was only $1.6 billion in 1990, and sat at $91.6 billion as of 2016. It is
now over $100 billion, including the $10 billion reinsurance deal with
AIG (AIG).
Equity portfolio
Berkshire’s investment
portfolio represents Buffett’s long-term conviction ideas.
At the end of 2016, about
60% of his equity portfolio was invested in five companies—Wells Fargo (WFC), Coca-Cola (KO), IBM (IBM), American Express (AXP) and Apple (AAPL), a position he
initiated last year and built up even more recently
Buffett also made a big bet on airlines last
year, diverging from his position in the past. He significantly increased
his positions in Delta (DAL), United
Airlines (UAL) and American
Airlines (AAL) while adding a
big stake in Southwest Air (LUV).
Shift to non-insurance businesses
Berkshire has evolved
from its early years, when it was an insurance-driven company driven by
outperformance on investments. It is now a large conglomerate that
includes many non-insurance businesses.
The railroad business
now comprises 22% of Berkshire earnings. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
(BNSF), which Berkshire acquired
in 2009 for $44 billion, is one of seven major railroads in North
America and carries 17% of all inter-city freight. Berkshire has been investing
heavily in this business.
Utilities businesses
comprise 10% of Berkshire earnings. BH Energy owns four utilities
servicing customers in 11 Western/Midwestern states, two electricity
distribution companies in England, two interstate pipelines, a renewable energy
business, and a residential real estate brokerage firm.
Berkshire’s
manufacturing, service and retailing (MSR) operations, 35% of total earnings,
include everything from candy to jets. Companies include food supply chain
company McLane, manufacturing businesses (like specialty chemicals company
Lubrizol, industrial components company Marmon, flooring company Shaw
Industries, and paint and coatings company Benjamin Moore), service and
retailing businesses (including NetJets, See’s Candies, Borsheim Jewelry
Company, the Pampered Chef, and Oriental Trading Company), recently acquired
battery maker Duracell, and aerospace components manufacturer Precision
Castparts, which Berkshire
bought in 2015 for $37 billion.
Its finance
businesses, 8% of earnings, focus largely on the manufacturing and financing of
homes and the leasing of transportation equipment. They include Clayton Homes,
UTLX, XTRA, and other leasing and financing activities.
Acquisitions accounted
for about 60% of Berkshire’s earnings growth in the past 20 years,
according to Morgan Stanley.
As Morgan Stanley’s
Kai Pan points out, Berkshire has a “managers as owners,” mentality, a
decentralization that allows each unit to focus on long-term goals.
Additionally, Pan highlights, each unit maintains an economic “moat” in its
respective industry, separating it from competition to some degree.
More acquisitions are
likely on the horizon for Berkshire, which has an estimated $60 billion in
excess capital.
Valuation
Buffett’s preferred
method for evaluating the attractiveness of investments and businesses is
intrinsic value, which represents the sum of all of discounted cash flows that
can be taken out of a business during its remaining life. The investor
Whitney Tilson sees the current intrinsic value at $300,000 per share,
significantly above the recent share price of $247,520.
Book value is another
approach used to value Berkshire. However, Buffett has noted that the metric
has underrepresented Berkshire’s intrinsic value because of the number of
operating businesses Berkshire has acquired, which are held on the books at
cost.
A book value
calculation does, however, provide a floor for investors. Berkshire has an
open-ended share repurchase program that authorizes management to repurchase
shares if the stock price drops below a price-to-book ratio of 1.2x.
Beneficiary of stimulus
As Morgan Stanley’s
Kai Pan points out, Berkshire has large exposure to Industrials and Financials
and thus will be a major beneficiary of the administration’s “pro-growth”
policies and tax reform, if they pan out.
“Given Berkshire’s
outsized exposure in Industrials and Financials, it is not surprising that BRK
shares have rallied +22% post-election vs. +14% for the S&P 500,” Pan wrote
on March 20. “A potentially lower US corporate tax rate would also aid
earnings. A 20% tax rate could boost BRK earnings by ~14% vs. its current ~30%
consolidated tax rate,” he added.
The
bottom line: Berkshire’s business
has transformed over the years, but remains focused on long-term return and the
efficient use of capital.
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
REITs and rights issues: Dilutive or not?
REITs and rights issues: Dilutive or not?
A very good write up by the infamous AK71 from ASSI.
A very good write up by the infamous AK71 from ASSI.
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Bill Gates, Warren Buffett And Oprah All Use The 5-Hour Rule-An hour a day (or five hours a week)
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s112/sh/22e1ab14-987f-4e18-bfd8-3050d4ff7a53/168992c2b93ac789b5bede5f4155a7c9
Top business leaders often spend five hours per week doing deliberate learning.
Many of these leaders, despite being extremely busy, set aside at least an hour a day (or five hours a week) over their entire career for activities that could be classified as deliberate practice or learning.
How the best leaders follow the 5-hour rule, they often fell into three buckets: reading, reflection, and experimentation.
1. Read
2. Reflect
3. Experiment
Top business leaders often spend five hours per week doing deliberate learning.
Many of these leaders, despite being extremely busy, set aside at least an hour a day (or five hours a week) over their entire career for activities that could be classified as deliberate practice or learning.
How the best leaders follow the 5-hour rule, they often fell into three buckets: reading, reflection, and experimentation.
1. Read
2. Reflect
3. Experiment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Stop Pushing Water Down - Push It Back for Real
Good video on our arm movement by @oceanswimschool
-
https://indexes.nasdaqomx.com/docs/fs_ndx.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R80FtG2kX9o US-Domiciled : 30% dividend tax Irish-Domicile...
-
Top 8 ETFs to buy for Singapore Investors in 2025 (by Financial Horse)
-
Good rotation Don't rush the PULL Avoid these 3 mistakes






